Files
2026-08-03 18:42:47 +08:00

48 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File

# Genetic Code Table
#
# Obtained from: http://www3.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Utils/wprintgc.cgi
#
# Version 3.1 - 1995
# Addition of Eubacterial by J.Ostell at NCBI
# Version 3.2 - 6/24/95
# Eubacterial renamed to Bacterial as most alternate starts
# have been found in Archaea
#
# Differences from the Standard Code:
#
# None
#
# Alternative Initiation Codons:
#
# GUG, UUG, AUU, CUG
#
# Systematic Range and Comments:
#
# Table 11 is used for Bacteria, Archaea, prokaryotic viruses and
# chloroplast proteins. As in the standard code, initiation is most
# efficient at AUG. In addition, GUG and UUG starts are documented in
# Archaea and Bacteria (Kozak 1983, Fotheringham et al. 1986, Golderer et
# al. 1995, Nolling et al. 1995, Sazuka & Ohara 1996, Genser et al.
# 1998, Wang et al. 2003). In E. coli, UUG is estimated to serve as
# initiator for about 3% of the bacterium's proteins (Blattner et al.
# 1997). CUG is known to function as an initiator for one plasmid-encoded
# protein (RepA) in Escherichia coli (Spiers and Bergquist, 1992). In
# addition to the NUG initiations, in rare cases Bacteria can initiate
# translation from an AUU codon as e.g. in the case of poly(A) polymerase
# PcnB and the InfC gene that codes for translation initiation factor IF3
# (Polard et al. 1991, Liveris et al. 1993, Sazuka & Ohara 1996, Binns &
# Masters 2002). The internal assignments are the same as in the standard
# code though UGA codes at low efficiency for Trp in Bacillus subtilis
# and, presumably, in Escherichia coli (Hatfiled and Diamond, 1993).
Genetic Code [11]
Bacterial and Plant Plastid
AAs = FFLLSSSSYY**CC*WLLLLPPPPHHQQRRRRIIIMTTTTNNKKSSRRVVVVAAAADDEEGGGG
Starts = ---M---------------M------------MMMM---------------M------------
Base1 = TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Base2 = TTTTCCCCAAAAGGGGTTTTCCCCAAAAGGGGTTTTCCCCAAAAGGGGTTTTCCCCAAAAGGGG
Base3 =
TCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAG